What Is Third-Party Risk Management?
This is where Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) comes in, and this is why it is important for compliance frameworks such as ISO 27001 or SOC 2 as we mentioned in our article What Are The Steps Toward Compliance.
Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) is the discipline of identifying, assessing, mitigating, and continuously monitoring risks that exist from relationships with external parties , such as vendors, suppliers, partners, contractors, and service providers.
These risks go far beyond cybersecurity. A third party may:
- • Access sensitive customer or employee data
- • Connect directly to internal systems
- • Perform a business-critical service
- • Operate in a regulated or high-risk jurisdiction
- • Rely on fourth parties you don't directly control
TPRM provides organizations with visibility, control, and assurance over this extended ecosystem. Ensuring that third parties meet security, compliance, operational, and ethical expectations throughout the entire relationship lifecycle.
In practice, TPRM often overlaps with terms like vendor risk management (VRM) or supply chain risk management, it is actually covering all third-party risks across the enterprise.
Why Third-Party Risk Is a Growing Concern
Third-party risk has become a board-level issue for several reasons:
1. Expanding attack surfaces
Even organizations with strong internal security controls remain vulnerable if their vendors have weaker defenses. Many major data breaches now originate through third-party access rather than direct compromise.
2. Increasing regulatory pressure
Regulations such as GDPR, DORA, NIS2, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 explicitly extend accountability to third parties. A vendor's failure can quickly become your compliance issue.
3. Operational dependency
From cloud infrastructure to payroll processing, third parties often support critical business functions. Outages, financial instability, or delivery failures can directly disrupt operations.
4. Reputational and ESG exposure
Unethical practices, data misuse, or regulatory violations by a third party can severely damage your customer trust, even if your organization is not directly responsible.
The Third-Party Risk Management Lifecycle
An effective TPRM program can change depending on the relationship it exists between your business and the third party service.
1. Third-party identification
Organizations begin by building a comprehensive inventory of all third parties.
2. Evaluation and selection
Before onboarding, vendors should be evaluated based on business needs, inherent risk, regulatory requirements, and alignment with internal policies.
3. Risk assessment
Risk assessments analyze exposure across multiple domains, such as:
- • Information security
- • Privacy and data protection
- • Operational resilience
- • Financial stability
- • Compliance and regulatory risk
- • Reputational and ethical risk
These assessments often rely on standardized frameworks (ISO, NIST, SIG, SOC reports) combined with questionnaires and evidence reviews.
4. Risk mitigation
Identified risks are prioritized and either accepted, mitigated, or rejected based on the organization's risk appetite. Mitigation actions may include control improvements, contractual safeguards, or remediation plans.
5. Contracting and onboarding
Risk requirements are embedded into contracts through clauses covering data protection, confidentiality, SLAs, audit rights, and incident notification.
6. Documentation and reporting
All activities must be documented to support audits, regulatory inquiries, and internal governance.
7. Continuous monitoring
Risk is not static. Ongoing monitoring tracks changes such as security incidents, regulatory updates, financial deterioration, or negative news affecting vendors.
8. Offboarding
When a relationship ends, access must be revoked, data securely returned or deleted, and the offboarding process documented to prevent residual risk.
TPRM Best Practices
At Probo, we try to optimize our third party risk management system by applying some best practices we recommend:
Prioritize vendors by data and business risk
Not all third parties present the same type of risk. A practical way to prioritize vendors is to distinguish between data risk and business risk.
Data risk focuses on the impact of a data compromise. This depends on the type and sensitivity of the data shared (personal data, financial data, intellectual property) and any regulatory obligations attached to it.
Business risk looks at operational impact. Vendors supporting critical services or core infrastructure may pose high business risk if an issue occurs, even if they handle limited data.
By assessing both dimensions together, organizations can better prioritize vendors and apply the right level of oversight, focusing effort where risk truly matters.
Embed TPRM early in procurement
Risk assessments should begin before contracts are signed, not after onboarding.
Automate wherever possible
Manual questionnaires and spreadsheets do not scale. Automation enables consistent assessments, real-time alerts, reassessments, and reporting.
Maintain continuous monitoring
Annual reviews are no longer sufficient. Organizations need ongoing insight into vendor risk posture as conditions change.
How Platforms Like Probo Support Effective TPRM
As third-party ecosystems grow, managing risk manually becomes unsustainable. This is where modern compliance and risk platforms play a critical role.
Solutions like Probo help organizations:
- • Centralize third-party compliance and risk evidence
- • Maintain audit-ready documentation
- • Align third-party oversight with frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR
- • Reduce friction between security, compliance, and business teams
- • Move from periodic to continuous assessments
Ready to streamline your Third-Party Risk Management?
See how Probo can help you manage vendor risks and maintain compliance.
Get Started with Probo